Anarcho-Communism

Can the communist vision of a just, fair and equal society for all be realised without the guidance of the state? Can justice and freedom be guaranteed in a post-revolutionary society? Are human beings naturally inclined to share possessions, cooperate with each other and consume no more of a commodity than they actually require? Anarcho-communism is apolitical ideologythat gives a resounding “yes” to all of these questions; but has it ever been tried in practice? Let's find out!

Anarcho-communism Definition

Fig. 1 How various schools of anarchist thought relate to each other

Anarcho-communism is a branch of collectivist anarchist thought. As you can see in the graphic above, anarcho-communist shares common 'roots' with other anarchist movements in its fundamental rejection of the state. As a branch ofcollectivist anarchism, anarcho-communism is profoundly influenced by Marxist thought, and actually accepts the Marxist doctrine ofCommunism. Like mainstream Marxist communists, anarcho-communists believe in the necessity of a workers' revolution to overthrowcapitalism, the collectivisation of the means of production and the fair distribution of resources according to the principle “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.

However, anarcho-communism departs from Marxist communism on a number of key points, which we examine below, including the role of the state andpolitical partiesin the transition to communism and how the product of human labour is distributed.

Anarcho-Communism Theory

Fig. 2Peter Kropotkin

Peter Kropotkinis often regarded as the founding father of anarcho-communism. Born in 1842 into an aristocratic family in Russia, Kropotkin rejected his class background from an early age, and after studying at a military school in St Petersburg, he spent his adult life pursuing his dual interests of geology and anarchist thought. InThe Conquest of Bread(1892), Kropotkin outlines his critique of state-ledcommunism. In another influential text,Mutual Aid(1902), Kropotkin rejects the Darwinian thesis that human beings are fundamentally competitive creatures, arguing instead that the human species is naturally empathetic, cooperative and inclined towards mutual assistance. For Kropotkin, these attributes mean that the organisation of society by means of a state is unnecessary, as human beings are naturally capable of organising themselves.

Kropotkin shared Marx's vision of a communist society without private property, social class or wage labour, in which property - especially the means of production - is communally-owned and resources fairly distributed according to need. However, Kropotkin's view departed from that ofKarl Marxin that he saw no role for the state in any part of this transition tocommunism. Marx envisaged the formation of a political party which would unite workers and allow them to gain political control of the state, managing the transition tocommunismuntil such time as the state became redundant. On the other hand, Kropotkin believed that the innate human leaning towards cooperation and mutual support meant that no state was required for society to move towards its communist future. Furthermore, the state, having nurtured and supportedcapitalismin its most oppressive form, could only corrupt and hinder the process of transforming society.

Anarcho-Communism Flag

Like many branches in anarchist thought, anarcho-communists use a flag to represent their ideology. Like other anarchist flags, the anarcho-communist flag is divided diagonally, with the lower right side being black - symbolisinganarchism- and the upper left side being red, as it is in other forms ofcollectivist anarchism- representing revolutionary, socialist and communist ideas. Anarcho-communists might further distinguish themselves from other groups by using a version of the anarchist 'A' symbol that also incorporates the hammer and sickle ofCommunism.

Fig. 3 flag for anarcho-communism

Anarcho-Communist Beliefs

Anarcho-Communists subscribe to a number of core beliefs about human society and the best way to organise it in order to achieve universal justice and freedom:

• Anoptimistic view of human nature- human beings are naturally cooperative, sociable and altruistic. Free from the coercion of the state, human beings would be able to organise themselves into a society based on these attributes.

• Anarcho-communists believe thatdirectdemocracyis the best way to reach decisions. Large-scale representative democracies inevitably result in some communities being left out, or their needs not being met.

• Without the state, individuals would form themselves intovoluntary communities.These voluntary communities would be the basic unit of political, social and economic organisation.

• Anarcho-communism views not only the means of production but also theproduct of labour, as communal property. There are no wages in an anarcho-communist system and individuals are recompensed for their labour only in proportion to their needs.

• Theabolition of private property, (whilst respecting personal property). Personal property refers to items of everyday use, such as clothing and household items. Private property refers to real estate or land, in an anarcho-communist system, all land, infrastructure and major enterprises would be under common ownership.

Anarcho-communism vs Anarchism

Anarchist thought begins with the fundamental rejection of the state. Beyond this, however, there is a great deal of variation in terms of what certain groups of anarchists believe should replace the state as an organising system for society and its political and economic activities.

Collectivist anarchists would argue that the state supports and maintainscapitalismand all its oppressive consequences, and would argue for a revolution to bring about the end of both state and capitalism and place the means of production under communal ownership.

At the other end of the anarchist spectrum, there are anarcho-capitalists, who would argue that there is nothing inherently wrong with a capitalist economy. Their main argument against the state would be that it places constraints on the free exercise of commerce.

With its emphasis on revolution and collectivisation, anarcho-communism belongs very clearly to the collectivist branch of anarchist thought. However, unlike other collectivist ideologies, such asanarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-communists believe that the product of labour should be communal property and not just the means of production. This means that individuals are not paid according to the amount or intensity of labour they perform, but rather the product of their labour is distributed to them according to need. Kropotkin argued that it's almost impossible to calculate a fair estimation of the “cost” of an individual's labour anyway since one would need to take into account a variety of factors which can't be easily measured.

Anarcho-Communism vs Communism

Karl Marxpredicted that capitalist systems would experience increasing volatility, with economic crashes and recessions becoming more frequent. He believed that eventually, the workers would rise up and seize both the means of production (factories, farms etc) and the institutions of the state (the army, the courts, the police etc) and form what he termed the “dictatorship of the proletariat”. This socialist state would need to exist long enough to prevent a comeback by capitalist elements, but once this threat had passed, the state would become increasingly redundant as it came to be replaced by a classless communist system of organisation. Communists have often viewed this “dictatorship of the proletariat” as a necessary transitional stage betweencapitalismandcommunism, and this was the ideological justification for the formation of communistpolitical partiesand, eventually, of communist states like the Soviet Union.

As mentioned above, anarcho-communists hold that human nature is intrinsically sociable and cooperative and, as a result, human society has no need for the state. For this reason, the Marxist concept of a workers' state to defend the revolution and help manage the transition tocommunismis totally unacceptable to anarcho-communists. Even a socialist, worker-led state would eventually replicate the same sort of hierarchies and coercive structures that allowedcapitalismto flourish in the first place. This is one of the principal points of difference between Marxist communist and anarcho-communist ideology.

Anarcho-Communism in History

While there are no examples of long-lived, sustained and successful attempts to implement anarcho-communism in the modern wordl, there are a few well-known examples of anarcho-communist projects in history.

The 'Makhnovshchina' or Free Territory of Ukraine was established in 1918 after the Insurrectionary Army of Nestor Makhno captured the city of Huliaipole.Huliaipole成为自由Territor的非官方首都y, in which Ukrainian people established an anarcho-communist society organised into communes. Workers in these territories seized land formerly owned by the state and the communes organised the redistribution and management of these assets. Many Ukrainian workers also stopped paying rent in rebellion against private property ownership. The anarchist force of this revolution was known as the Black Army. The Free Territory existed only until 1921, when the White Army (Russian Nationalists) began occupying and pushing back Makhno's Black Army. The region eventually came under Bolshevik Control.

During the Spanish Revolution, the region of Catalonia was governed in line with anarcho-communist ideals between 1936 and 1939. Trade unions took the responsibility for economic and social affairs, with the National Confederation of Labor (CNT) being the largest trade union in revolutionary Catalonia. The rights of women and the collectivisation of various enterprises was emphasised by Catalan revolutionaries, who were often directly inspired by the works ofPeter Kropotkin. Revolutionary Catalonia was eventually brought under the control of nationalist forces led by General Franco in 1939.