Log In Start studying!
StudySmarter——一体化的研究应用。
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
|
|

Single Transferable Vote

Single Transferable Vote

How do we sustaindemocracyin nations where regional divides and historic tensions threaten social stability? How do we counter the threat of political polarisation in systems where the reins of government pass between two major parties? The Single Transferable Vote model was developed to answer these challenges by providing the electorate with a variety of candidates who can govern in unison. Let's see how this works - both in theory and in practice.

Single Transferable Vote meaning

Developed in the 19th century, the Single Transferable Vote (STV) is a model ofproportional representation(PR).

Proportional Representationis an electoral system which aims to reflect subgroups and地方主义. Unlike pluralist systems, in which leaders are selected once they gain a majority of the votes, proportional representation systems aim to be more inclusive and representative.

Let's say we have 5 candidates running, and three seats available in what is known as a multi-member district. In this particular election, there is a voter turnout of 300,000 people. Each voter is asked to rank the 5 candidates, with the most desirable put in first place and the rest being placed from 2 - 5. Once all the votes are cast, this formula, known as the Droop quota, is used to determine if there is at least one outright winner:

T o t a l V o t e s ( 300 , 000 ) T o t a l N u m b e r o f S e a t s ( 3 ) + 1 + 1

So, in our example, the threshold is 75,001. Let's say one candidate, Candidate A, receives this number of votes, thus crossing the threshold. But remember, we still have two more seats to distribute. To assign these two seats, the surplus votes received by Candidate A (i.e. the number of votes over the threshold) are allocated to the second place, so the candidate who was ranked directly behind Candidate A on each ballot.

Thus, the second-placed candidate, Candidate B, who initially received 69,500 votes, will in theory be the next to cross the threshold once these surplus votes have been distributed. They may even be sufficient for the third place candidate to cross the threshold simultaneously, but if not the process will repeat itself by reassigning the surplus votes received by Candidate B.

If in our hypothetical election no candidate managed to pass the 75,001 vote threshold, STV is designed to still produce a legitimate outcome. In this instance, the candidate who was ranked last (i.e. the candidate with the most 5th place rankings) would be eliminated, and their votes would be allocated in the same manner we have laid out above.

Single Transferable Vote systems

STV's chief appeal is the possibility of multi-party and cross-community representation and it contrasts with the outcomes of elections conducted under majoritarianelectoral systemssuch asFirst-Past-the-Post(FPTP).During the latter half of the 19th century, European societies began to undergo significant political changes. The decline in the fortunes of liberal parties across the continent was accompanied by a growing parliamentary socialist movement. Thus, it was feared that the two-party system produced by majoritarian electoral models would end up leaving voters with two polarising options: conservative or socialist.

First-Past-the-Post:an example of a pluralist, or majoritarian, electoral system. Under this system, candidates from various parties stand in one district and whichever candidate wins a plurality of votes (ie, the largest number of votes) wins that seat outright. Unlike single transferable vote, the voter only selects one candidate.

Single Transferable Vote Plurality Ballot Paper StudySmarterAn example ballot paper for plurality voting systems such as FPTP which, unlike PR systems, offer the choice of only one candidate, Wikimedia Commons

Concerns over the polarising effect of majoritarian voting systems lead to a search for more representative and inclusiveelectoral systems. The British MP, lawyer and reformer Thomas Hare (1806-1891), in hisTreatise on the Election of Representatives, lays the foundation for the STV system. Through its multi-member districts and transferrable vote mechanism, Hare claimed that STV would

end the evils of corruption, violent discontent and restricted power of selection or voter choice.1

兔子的方法提出了子sequent decades, and even won the praise of influential Liberal philosopher J.S. Mill. It has historically been used in countries with smaller populations, as a multi-member community system functions best in these conditions.

Today, the only independent states which use STV for national elections areMaltaand theRepublic of Ireland.

STV relies ondistrict magnitudeto effectively achieve proportionality. Its proportional representation function has also proved incredibly useful in areas with tense political histories and regional tensions.

District Magnituderefers to the need for large electoral constituencies in systems which are aiming for proportional representation in multi-member districts

Single Transferable Vote UK

STV, as we have said, operates best in countries or regions with a relatively small population. The multi-member districts are constituencies in which elected representatives from multiple parties serve in the national legislature (Assembly orParliament). Therefore, one of STV's chief selling points, in terms of the outcomes it creates, is that it brings different voices to the table.

In the UK, STV is used for elections to the Northern Irish Assembly, a devolved legislature that was established in 1998. Voters in eighteen parliamentary constituencies are asked to select candidates who will represent them in the Assembly. Ultimately, 5 Members of the Legislative Assembly are chosen in each constituency.

Single Transferable Vote Northern Ireland Election Result shown on the map StudySmarterA breakdown of the 2017 Northern Ireland Assembly results in each of the 18 constituencies, Wikimedia Commons

So, why is STV used in Northern Ireland? The answer to that question lies in the political history of the island of Ireland. For over thirty years, from the 1960s until the late 1990s, Northern Ireland experienced a sustained period of political violence and turmoil known asthe Troubles.During this time, what was known as 'home rule' (i.e. the ability to govern the nation independently) was withdrawn from Northern Ireland and it was governed directly by Westminster. Once the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 created a system for power-sharing across the political divide, the Northern Ireland Assembly was established and STV was chosen as its electoral system.

The Troubles,whichlasted from the 1960s until the late 1990s was a period of violent political turmoil in Northern Ireland. The issue at the heart of the conflict related to Northern Ireland's relationship with the UK - with Unionists promoting membership in the United Kingdom and Republicans advocating for union with the Republic of Ireland.

The STV electoral system in Northern Ireland works in the way described above with the Droop quota determining the threshold which a candidate must pass to enter the Assembly. There is another condition in the process, unique to the Northern Irish system, which stipulates that candidates must declare their 'Affiliation' as either republican, loyalist, or other. Thus, STV's multi-member constituencies and multi-party representation offer an electoral solution to the regional tensions in Northern Irish society.

STV in theWelsh Parliament(Senedd)

A second devolved legislature within the UK, the Senedd (Welsh Parliament), is currently in the process of deciding if STV may be the best system to conduct local elections in 2027. Currently, the Welsh Assembly conducts these elections using the pluralistic FPTP system. However, there is a concern that this system is not producing adequate representation at the local community level. The Welsh Local Government and Elections Act (2021) proposed the change, and in 2022 the Senedd will vote on whether or not to adopt STV.

转移投票法副词antages

As we have discussed, there are several features of STV that make it extremely helpful in developing and sustainingdemocracy, particularly in certain political contexts.

Every vote counts

Perhaps the most advantageous feature of STV is that every vote cast counts. The act of transferring votes, once a candidate has either passed the threshold or been eliminated if no single candidate has done so, means that the overall preferences of the electorate will be reflected. This is, for proponents of PRelectoral systems, majori比多元化更理想的系统tarian systems such as FPTP. In such systems, the preferences expressed by substantial minorities within the electorate are unrecognised and unrepresented in the results.

Proportional representation in single transferable vote

The STV system also allows for a form of proportional representation. During elections in multi-member districts, parties can put forward more than one candidate in a single district. Therefore, STV becomes immediately more advantageous than pluralistic systems in the sense that voters are not tied down by party allegiances when selecting candidates. Furthermore, once a proper district magnitude is applied, STV produces a diverse range of representatives working within one singular region.

Single Transferrable Vote disadvantages

STV is far from perfect in terms of its ability to deliver some of the outcomes it is designed to achieve.

Complicated and lengthy process of single transferable vote

Due to the process of transferring votes following each count, STV systems can take some time to produce an outcome. Thus, STV is very unlikely to produce same-day results, which are more common in majoritarian systems. When combined with the system of ranking on the ballot paper which can lead to what is known asdonkey voting,STV may create voter apathy. Historically, the more lengthy and complicated the process is, the lower the voter turn-out will become over time.

Donkey Votingdescribes an electoral phenomenon which occurs in list-basedelectoral systems(such as STV) in which apathetic voters rank candidates from 1 - 5 simply by how the candidates' names appear from the top of the ballot paper to the bottom

Single Transferable Vote Donkey Voting Example paper StudySmarterAn example of a 'Donkey Vote', Wikimedia Commons

Impact of single transferable vote on party politics

STV, furthermore, may not provide the representation that its designed to. That is because, in a situation where a party has fielded multiple candidates, STV can promote the individual over the party, thus undermining the role of policy documents, such as party manifestos. There is also an argument that STV doesn't deliver proportional representation, as the transfer of votes once the threshold is met can lead to a result where the party with the majority of votes ends up losing the election. This was the case in the Maltese election in 1981, after which an adjustment had to be made to the electoral system.

Single Transferable Vote - Key takeaways

  • Single Transferrable Vote (STV) is an electoral system which is a form of proportional representation.
  • STV was developed by British lawyer and MP Thomas Hare, as a response to what he perceived to be the polarising outcomes created by majoritarian electoral systems.
  • STV is used for national elections in Malta and the Republic of Ireland.
  • It is also used in elections to the Northern Irish Assembly, where the multi-member representation it offers creates a political framework for conflict resolution.
  • Two advantages of STV are that fewer votes are wasted than under majoritarian systems and that its proportional representation bolstersdemocracy.
  • Two disadvantages are that it is a long process which can create voter apathy and that it can undermine aspects of the party system.

References

  1. Thomas Hare, Treatise in the Election of Representatives, 1873.

Frequently Asked Questions about Single Transferable Vote

Single Transferrable Vote (STV) is a list-based electoral system, in which voters are asked to rank candidates on the ballot paper in order of preference. Votes for successful candidates over a certain threshold are transferred to those ranked below them, making it a system which aims to maximise representation.

The most notable example of STV being used in the UK is its use in elections to the Northern Irish Assembly. In this context, STV is desirable as it offers diverse representation. The Welsh Assembly will hold a vote this year to decide if they will use STV in their 2027 elections.

STV can be a complicated and lengthy process, which historically breeds voter apathy. Also, STV does not necessarily support the traditional party political structure

STV下的投票系统转移s, votes are much less likely to be wasted than in majoritarian systems. It also creates a system of multi-member proportional representation which encourages democratic cooperation

Under STV, voters are asked to rank multiple candidates in order of preference. Votes are then counted and a formula known as the Droop quota is applied to determine the number of votes necessary for a candidate to be successful. Once a candidate passes the threshold, their surplus votes are transferred to those ranked below them on the ballot

Final Single Transferable Vote Quiz

Question

What does STV stand for?

Show answer

Answer

Single transferable vote

Show question

Question

Which country in the United Kingdom uses Single Transferrable Vote for elections to their Assembly?

Show answer

Answer

Northern Ireland

Show question

Question

What is the name of the quota used to calculate the threshold for Single Transferrable Vote elections?

Show answer

Answer

The Droop quota

Show question

Question

What is 'donkey voting'?

Show answer

Answer

A symptom of voter apathy, in which voters rank candidates as they appear on the list rather than preference

Show question

Question

What form of representation is Single Transferrable Vote an example of?

Show answer

Answer

Proportional Representation

Show question

Question

In the Single Transferrable Vote system, what happens if no candidate reaches the quota on the first count?

Show answer

Answer

The lowest-placed candidate is eliminated and their second preference is transferred.

Show question

Question

What are two advantages of Single Transferrable Vote?

Show answer

Answer

Every Vote Counts and Proportional Representation

Show question

Question

What is District Magnitude?

Show answer

Answer

A term which identifies the need for large electoral constituencies in systems which are aiming for proportional representation in multi-member districts

Show question

Question

What are two disadvantages of the Single Transferrable Vote system?

Show answer

Answer

It is a long process which can create voter apathy, and it can be detrimental to the party political system

Show question

Question

Who first came up a kind STV system?

Show answer

Answer

Thomas Hare

Show question

60%

of the users don't pass the Single Transferable Vote quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

Discover the right content for your subjects

No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!

Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.

Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time.

Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.

雷竞技苹果官网

Have all your study materials in one place.

Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online.

Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses.

Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.

Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.

Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.

Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.

Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Baidu
map