StudySmarter——一体化的研究应用。
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
How do we sustaindemocracyin nations where regional divides and historic tensions threaten social stability? How do we counter the threat of political polarisation in systems where the reins of government pass between two major parties? The Single Transferable Vote model was developed to answer these challenges by providing the electorate with a variety of candidates who can govern in unison. Let's see how this works - both in theory and in practice.
Developed in the 19th century, the Single Transferable Vote (STV) is a model ofproportional representation(PR).
Proportional Representationis an electoral system which aims to reflect subgroups and地方主义. Unlike pluralist systems, in which leaders are selected once they gain a majority of the votes, proportional representation systems aim to be more inclusive and representative.
Let's say we have 5 candidates running, and three seats available in what is known as a multi-member district. In this particular election, there is a voter turnout of 300,000 people. Each voter is asked to rank the 5 candidates, with the most desirable put in first place and the rest being placed from 2 - 5. Once all the votes are cast, this formula, known as the Droop quota, is used to determine if there is at least one outright winner:
So, in our example, the threshold is 75,001. Let's say one candidate, Candidate A, receives this number of votes, thus crossing the threshold. But remember, we still have two more seats to distribute. To assign these two seats, the surplus votes received by Candidate A (i.e. the number of votes over the threshold) are allocated to the second place, so the candidate who was ranked directly behind Candidate A on each ballot.
Thus, the second-placed candidate, Candidate B, who initially received 69,500 votes, will in theory be the next to cross the threshold once these surplus votes have been distributed. They may even be sufficient for the third place candidate to cross the threshold simultaneously, but if not the process will repeat itself by reassigning the surplus votes received by Candidate B.
If in our hypothetical election no candidate managed to pass the 75,001 vote threshold, STV is designed to still produce a legitimate outcome. In this instance, the candidate who was ranked last (i.e. the candidate with the most 5th place rankings) would be eliminated, and their votes would be allocated in the same manner we have laid out above.
STV's chief appeal is the possibility of multi-party and cross-community representation and it contrasts with the outcomes of elections conducted under majoritarianelectoral systemssuch asFirst-Past-the-Post(FPTP).During the latter half of the 19th century, European societies began to undergo significant political changes. The decline in the fortunes of liberal parties across the continent was accompanied by a growing parliamentary socialist movement. Thus, it was feared that the two-party system produced by majoritarian electoral models would end up leaving voters with two polarising options: conservative or socialist.
First-Past-the-Post:an example of a pluralist, or majoritarian, electoral system. Under this system, candidates from various parties stand in one district and whichever candidate wins a plurality of votes (ie, the largest number of votes) wins that seat outright. Unlike single transferable vote, the voter only selects one candidate.
Concerns over the polarising effect of majoritarian voting systems lead to a search for more representative and inclusiveelectoral systems. The British MP, lawyer and reformer Thomas Hare (1806-1891), in hisTreatise on the Election of Representatives, lays the foundation for the STV system. Through its multi-member districts and transferrable vote mechanism, Hare claimed that STV would
end the evils of corruption, violent discontent and restricted power of selection or voter choice.1
兔子的方法提出了子sequent decades, and even won the praise of influential Liberal philosopher J.S. Mill. It has historically been used in countries with smaller populations, as a multi-member community system functions best in these conditions.
Today, the only independent states which use STV for national elections areMaltaand theRepublic of Ireland.
STV relies ondistrict magnitudeto effectively achieve proportionality. Its proportional representation function has also proved incredibly useful in areas with tense political histories and regional tensions.
District Magnituderefers to the need for large electoral constituencies in systems which are aiming for proportional representation in multi-member districts
STV, as we have said, operates best in countries or regions with a relatively small population. The multi-member districts are constituencies in which elected representatives from multiple parties serve in the national legislature (Assembly orParliament). Therefore, one of STV's chief selling points, in terms of the outcomes it creates, is that it brings different voices to the table.
In the UK, STV is used for elections to the Northern Irish Assembly, a devolved legislature that was established in 1998. Voters in eighteen parliamentary constituencies are asked to select candidates who will represent them in the Assembly. Ultimately, 5 Members of the Legislative Assembly are chosen in each constituency.
So, why is STV used in Northern Ireland? The answer to that question lies in the political history of the island of Ireland. For over thirty years, from the 1960s until the late 1990s, Northern Ireland experienced a sustained period of political violence and turmoil known asthe Troubles.During this time, what was known as 'home rule' (i.e. the ability to govern the nation independently) was withdrawn from Northern Ireland and it was governed directly by Westminster. Once the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 created a system for power-sharing across the political divide, the Northern Ireland Assembly was established and STV was chosen as its electoral system.
The Troubles,whichlasted from the 1960s until the late 1990s was a period of violent political turmoil in Northern Ireland. The issue at the heart of the conflict related to Northern Ireland's relationship with the UK - with Unionists promoting membership in the United Kingdom and Republicans advocating for union with the Republic of Ireland.
The STV electoral system in Northern Ireland works in the way described above with the Droop quota determining the threshold which a candidate must pass to enter the Assembly. There is another condition in the process, unique to the Northern Irish system, which stipulates that candidates must declare their 'Affiliation' as either republican, loyalist, or other. Thus, STV's multi-member constituencies and multi-party representation offer an electoral solution to the regional tensions in Northern Irish society.
STV in theWelsh Parliament(Senedd)
A second devolved legislature within the UK, the Senedd (Welsh Parliament), is currently in the process of deciding if STV may be the best system to conduct local elections in 2027. Currently, the Welsh Assembly conducts these elections using the pluralistic FPTP system. However, there is a concern that this system is not producing adequate representation at the local community level. The Welsh Local Government and Elections Act (2021) proposed the change, and in 2022 the Senedd will vote on whether or not to adopt STV.
As we have discussed, there are several features of STV that make it extremely helpful in developing and sustainingdemocracy, particularly in certain political contexts.
Perhaps the most advantageous feature of STV is that every vote cast counts. The act of transferring votes, once a candidate has either passed the threshold or been eliminated if no single candidate has done so, means that the overall preferences of the electorate will be reflected. This is, for proponents of PRelectoral systems, majori比多元化更理想的系统tarian systems such as FPTP. In such systems, the preferences expressed by substantial minorities within the electorate are unrecognised and unrepresented in the results.
The STV system also allows for a form of proportional representation. During elections in multi-member districts, parties can put forward more than one candidate in a single district. Therefore, STV becomes immediately more advantageous than pluralistic systems in the sense that voters are not tied down by party allegiances when selecting candidates. Furthermore, once a proper district magnitude is applied, STV produces a diverse range of representatives working within one singular region.
STV is far from perfect in terms of its ability to deliver some of the outcomes it is designed to achieve.
Due to the process of transferring votes following each count, STV systems can take some time to produce an outcome. Thus, STV is very unlikely to produce same-day results, which are more common in majoritarian systems. When combined with the system of ranking on the ballot paper which can lead to what is known asdonkey voting,STV may create voter apathy. Historically, the more lengthy and complicated the process is, the lower the voter turn-out will become over time.
Donkey Votingdescribes an electoral phenomenon which occurs in list-basedelectoral systems(such as STV) in which apathetic voters rank candidates from 1 - 5 simply by how the candidates' names appear from the top of the ballot paper to the bottom
STV, furthermore, may not provide the representation that its designed to. That is because, in a situation where a party has fielded multiple candidates, STV can promote the individual over the party, thus undermining the role of policy documents, such as party manifestos. There is also an argument that STV doesn't deliver proportional representation, as the transfer of votes once the threshold is met can lead to a result where the party with the majority of votes ends up losing the election. This was the case in the Maltese election in 1981, after which an adjustment had to be made to the electoral system.
Single Transferrable Vote (STV) is a list-based electoral system, in which voters are asked to rank candidates on the ballot paper in order of preference. Votes for successful candidates over a certain threshold are transferred to those ranked below them, making it a system which aims to maximise representation.
The most notable example of STV being used in the UK is its use in elections to the Northern Irish Assembly. In this context, STV is desirable as it offers diverse representation. The Welsh Assembly will hold a vote this year to decide if they will use STV in their 2027 elections.
STV can be a complicated and lengthy process, which historically breeds voter apathy. Also, STV does not necessarily support the traditional party political structure
STV下的投票系统转移s, votes are much less likely to be wasted than in majoritarian systems. It also creates a system of multi-member proportional representation which encourages democratic cooperation
Under STV, voters are asked to rank multiple candidates in order of preference. Votes are then counted and a formula known as the Droop quota is applied to determine the number of votes necessary for a candidate to be successful. Once a candidate passes the threshold, their surplus votes are transferred to those ranked below them on the ballot
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.